Against Freud: Critics Talk Back Review
From Freud's Wednesday Seminars, over 100 years ago, until very recently "dynamic psychiatry" has been a closed book, both in its theory and praxis. This is not to say that a careful student could not get the low down on this black art by critical reading of the original fifteen, or so, foundational writings of Freud. Rather, that finding historians and knowing professionals to acknowledge the shell game that is psychoanalysis requires parsing cryptic references and reading between the lines of the professional commentary. As recently as Nietzsche's Presence in Freud's Life and Thought: On the Origins of a Psychology of Dynamic Unconscious Mental Functioning, Ronald Lehrer (1995); Nietzsche and Depth Psychology, Jacob Golomb (1999); Nietzsche and Jung: The Whole Self in the Union of Opposites, Lucy Huskinson (2005) Assoun, Paul-Laurent's Freud and Nietzsche (2006); otherwise praiseworthy authors have lacked the courage to tell the simple truth about Freud and Freudianism.
Plainly speaking, Freud was a liar, a plagiarist, and a con man. Or to use my terminology, Freud was a `pale criminal'.
With Todd Dufresne's book the charade should be over. Against Freud is a collection of interviews with people who either had first hand experience with Freud, or historians and practitioners who have parted the veil that has shrouded Freud scholarship. Although the interviews are said to be "edited", the feel of each is of sitting over the shoulder of the nine (or ten) interviewers, listening as the interview takes place--being present. The final chapter "Suggested Reading" is even-handed and complete. Dufresne's article of February 18, 2004, "Psychoanalysis Is Dead" for the Los Angeles Times should have laid many of the questions to rest. But the persistence of the Freudian illusion continues to today. (An illusion without a future, I would say.) Now there is no further reason to claim to be duped.
The language of the interviewee's is straightforward--as, for example, Frank Coiffi, in chapter 6, who analogizes the animal practice of "marking out an area as belonging to them", reminding me of the several, well-respected Yale scholars who have marked out entire disciplines based on a belief in and misreading of Freud. Or, the report of Hans Israel at page 124, "People still want to see Freud as a hero or as a villain, while, in fact, he was just an ambitious fellow who made stupid mistakes". Equally to be noted is the honesty and relative neutrality of the interviews, as marred by (or more precisely informed by) the reflexive question put to Hans Israël by the interview team of Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen and Sonu Shamdasani at page 119: "How do you know his motive? Are you his analysts?" The attentive reader (or listener) will immediately recognize interviewer bias from the formation of the question, from the implication that assignment of "motive" requires certification or credential. Israël's comments about the French Freudian psychoanalyst, Jacques Lacan, are, as the Master Card commercial puts it, "priceless" - "I've always hesitated about whether Lacan was a pure swindler or something more that that...Now, if what you are saying is true, this clearly shows that the man was swindler" (page 127). Powerful stuff.
I ordered Dufresne's book as a potential reference for my next book, left it on the shelf waiting for the time to be ripe; but pulled it down, on lark, or during a lull in the research. Against Freud: Critics Talk Back leaves nothing more for me to say on the subject; except, perhaps to refer my readers to this excellent account of Freudian revisionism.
Bravo, Mr. Dufresne!
[...]
"This is a fascinating work. Dufresne has taken a complex problem of great importance to contemporary culture and made it into a highly accessible volume that holds the reader's interest throughout."
--Joel Paris, McGill University
"Todd Dufresne is the leading student of the Freud Wars of recent vintage. In his fascinating new book he assembles interviews with some of the leading Warriors, among them Frank Sulloway, Frederick Crews, and Edward Shorter. Dufresne himself is a Freud revisionist, but a judicious and learned one."
--Paul Robinson, Stanford University
Everyone agrees that Sigmund Freud has had a profound impact on Western society and intellectual life. But even today few people know much about his life and work beyond the legends that Freud and his adherents created, fostered, and repeated. The result is an enormous cross-disciplinary field characterized by contradiction and confusion. Only the experts could possibly make sense of it all--but not always, since no field is as thoroughly undercut by ideology, acrimony, and bad faith as psychoanalysis.
Against Freud collects the frank musings of some of the world's best critics of Freud, providing a convincing and coherent "case against Freud" that is as amusing as it is rigorously presented. Hailing from diverse academic backgrounds--history, philosophy, literary criticism, sociology, psychotherapy, and psychiatry--this diverse group includes renowned international figures such as Edward Shorter, Frank Sulloway, Frederick Crews, and Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen, as well as those who knew Freud and his family. Listen in on the critics and then decide for yourself whether or not "Freud is dead."